Bulwark Intelligence

IPOB

COUNTER INSURGENCY, CURATED OSINT, INTELLIGENCE, Nigeria, SECURITY THREATS, TERRORISM

SECURITY THREATS TO THE 2023 ELECTIONS: THREAT ACTORS EVALUATION

In two months’ time, elections are expected to be undertaken across the country; however, the implications of insecurity affecting the integrity of the polls form a fraction of the criticism of the government’s ability to provide a secure environment for the conduct of a peaceful and transparent election. Pockets of disruptive attacks by non-state actors are seen as an unavoidable occurrence given the presence of a diverse range of existing threat actors engaged in political violence across the country. Several security operations remain adequately active, having recorded feats over the past months such as the arrest or neutralization of threat actors, increased aerial interdiction, upgraded arsenals, and most importantly, vibrant intelligence-driven coordination towards arresting criminal activities across the North and South; however, despite these mentioned feats, criminality and all sorts of manifestations of insecurity continue to take a huge toll on the civilian population. One major contributing factor is the proliferation of small arms and light weapons (SALWs), which has resulted from illegal and porous national borders manned by a weak border security system heavily impacted by corruption and negligence. This is fueling Nigeria’s security challenges as armed groups have been able to fortify themselves thanks to easy access to illicit firearms. According to Muhammed Akinyemi’s human-angle report titled Nigeria’s Coat of Arms, “With ₦15,000 ($34), you will get a local gun. A single barrel long-range [can be bought] for ₦25,000 ($57).” The proliferation of illicit weapons encourages acts of terror, gradually pushing the population into despondency, and also likely to encourage apathy, the political issues associated with this is looked into in Yusuf Gupa’s Dynamics Of The 2023 Elections. This article looks to discuss some of these security threat actors, their evolution, their strengths, and their impact on the elections in 2023.  Bandits Ragtag bandit groups, which are decentralized, unidentified armed groups generally operating in areas where states have shown an inability to exercise their authority in Nigeria’s northwest and northcentral regions, have contributed considerably to a surge in security threats associated with bandit terror campaigns such as violent assaults on commuters and villages, murder, kidnappings, and skirmishes with security services, the latter of which has triggered heavy kinetic offensives by the military.  For 11 years, banditry has persisted, with civilians bearing the brunt of crimes that have resulted in high fatalities, displacement, and severe economic shocks. The reign of bandits has evolved over time to encompass parallel administrations, in which they manage towns under their control, encouraging tax collection, forced marriages, and combatant recruiting. Bandits’ threat has been sustained during the pre-election season, primarily comprised of kidnapping and small-weapons attacks against political chieftains and election officials, with no clear motive to support or oppose the elections. A typical example of these attacks include; Kaduna Kajuru LGA – Around 1 April 2022, a Kaduna militia abducted seven persons related to the PDP chairman in Kajuru LGA. One abductee was released earlier on health grounds, one was killed after the ransom demands were not met. Chikun LGA – On 22 September 2022, a Kaduna militia attacked some chieftains of the APC, wounded three people, killed two, and abducted others at Tashar Icce near Kujama (Chikun, Kaduna). The victims were coming back from a political meeting in Kujama. Kagarko LGA: On April 25, 2022, a Kaduna militia killed an APC ward chairman and several others when they attacked several communities in Kagarko LGA (Kaduna). Scores of residents were abducted, others were seriously wounded, and some cows and household animals were seized. Kajuru LGA—  Around April 2022 (as reported), members of a Kaduna militia killed one of the seven abductees related to the PDP chairman of Kajuru LGA over the non-payment of ransom. Katsina  Katsina LGA – On 3 September 2022, policemen clashed with a Katsina militia who abducted three people in the Katsina metropolis (Katsina, Katsina). One of the abductees was the candidate for the Kankia zone state house of assembly from the PDP, his wife, and the registrar of Isa Kaita college of education. Niger Mariga LGA – On 25 May 2022, members of a Niger communal militia killed four PDP delegates between Mariga and Tegina (Mariga, Niger) while they were on their way home from Minna. The vehicle the victims were travelling in was shot at by the assailants. Zamfara  Anka LGA – On April 1, 2022, members of a Zamfara militia abducted an unspecified number of commuters, including two APC members, on the Anka-Zuru federal highway in Dajin Daki Takwas, Anka LGA (Zamfara). Nasiru Yari (APC), who was one of the abductees, was released. Bukkuyum LGA – On 29 June 2022, Zamfara militiamen abducted an unspecified number of persons from Gadar Zaima, coded to Bukuyum (Bukkuyum, Zamfara) on the village market day. The abductees include the village head, a political secretary of a political party from Kyaram. Tsafe LGA – On 6 June 2022, Zamfara militiamen abducted a former permanent commissioner of the Zamfara Independent Electoral commission alongside his younger brother at Gidan-Giye, near Tsafe town (Zamfara). The abductees were trying to fix their car which developed a fault. Zurmi LGA – On 28 October 2022, a Zamfara militia led by Gwaska Dankarami simultaneously invaded two residences and abducted two persons in Dauran Birnin Tsaba (Zurmi, Zamfara). The abductees were a district head and an APC chieftain, the militia leader called the abductee’s relative to confirm the abduction which he claimed was a reprisal for the seizure of his motorcycles by security operatives. The majority of the group’s activity has been propelled by various ineffective initiatives in dealing with the situation, which evolved from genuine anti-marginalization agitation to pure terrorism and criminality. The porous environment, on the other hand, over time allowed for the massive proliferation of SALW, which fell into the hands of these groups ushering acts of terror and, in fact, drawing the interest of several other actors, including organized armed groups such as Lakurawa [an armed militia group from Mali] in Sokoto State, armed religious sects such as Dar-Salam scattered in Nassawara, Niger, and

CRIME, CURATED OSINT, ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE, Maritime Security, Nigeria, Reports

UNRAVELING OIL THEFT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE NATION’S ECONOMY

In light of the recent spike in oil losses, the Nigerian economy is currently in desperate need of resuscitation and restructuring. Reports indicate that between 300,000 and 400,000 barrels of oil are lost each year due to illicit theft and the government’s incapacity to control the operations of local criminal syndicates and separatists militants operating within the Niger Delta. However, analysis and claims by the Chief of Naval Staff contradicts the impractical evaluation owing to the distinction between the strategic terms which stipulates oil losses happen when there is known output, particularly during shut-ins and forced circumstances, preventing the Federal Government from earning the revenue it should while oil theft involves siphoning crude oil from vandalized pipes into ships by criminals involved in oil bunkering. The case of oil theft and oil losses seeks to unveil the disparities in the oil producing process as it remains unrealistic for the transportation of the unspecified amount of stolen crude oil without being noticed owing to the significant presence of security forces tasked with monitoring the Maritime border areas. An alarming example is the arrest of oil thieves on a  3-million-barrel-capacity MV HEROIC IDUN, a supertanker which  fled from Nigeria’s AKPO oilfield when its activities were uncovered by operatives of the Nigerian Navy. This indicated renewed collaboration among Gulf of Guinea countries, it also unveiled an interwoven criminal web with various culprits which is what we find at the end of the short stick of a $300 million loss within if the ship was not discovered. From irregularities within the chain of command and documentation procedure to the unspecified figures in ascertaining the exact loss, the oil theft and losses the nation suffers is a tragedy in itself. In hindsight, the allegation made by the President of Nigeria following an interview with Bloomberg on  21 June 2022 which linked the vandalism and Oil theft to the activities of IPOB and its affiliation with international criminal bodies which has led to an upsurge in insecurity within the Oil producing states may seem far fetched and overestimated. This evaluation does not vindicate IPOB activities which has impacted the state of security within the Southern part of the country, however, the consistent losses reveals a more intricate and complex deficiency in the governing bodies, high level security operatives and structures which have enabled a lax and easy access for collaborations with local and international criminal syndicates within the Niger Delta. An unintentional disparity exists between the actions of separatist groups that dates back to the founding of the country and the struggle for control of the resources in some regions of Nigeria. The belief that the distribution of resources does not match the distribution of revenue within the nation’s budgeting system is one of the foundation for the emergence of separatist groups from an economic standpoint.This has proven problematic because Nigeria depends largely on the extraction of oil, which is the main natural resource present in the country’s south and southeast, notably the oil producing states which consist; Abia, Akwa-Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo, Imo, Ondo and Rivers state. Nigeria produces 8% of OPEC’s total daily production and 3% of the world’s volume, making it the world’s 12th largest petroleum producer on the global market (NNPC, 2000). However, the country suffers the greatest loss in petroleum resources as a result of oil theft and oil losses within the Niger Delta region of the nation. According to estimates, 15% of Nigeria’s daily 2.4 million barrels of oil are stolen. Oil theft, or “bunkering,” happens majorly within the Niger Delta area, however, unaccountability of security forces tasked with protecting the nations reserves and the upsurges in oil theft in recent times goes beyond monetary value and the loss in revenue as another troubling issue remains the health risks to residents. Residents and local governing structures fail to understand that accountability cuts across all the regulatory bodies, as more areas are at risk of the health hazard attributed to pollution from soot and the destruction of the ecosystem which has a long lasting impact. This remains a case of encouraging the small fires and watching the house burn while blaming the flames and not taking actions, at this rate, the responsibility cuts across every actor on the board. Furthermore, it is agonizing to reveal that in the era of advanced technology which Saudi Arabia has employed in regulating and monitoring crude oil production, our process remains rudimentary for a country where 95% of export revenues is dependent on oil production and the fourth-lowest percentage of all government revenue are derived from oil. In Mexico, which produces a comparable amount of oil, just 5,000 to 10,000 barrels are stolen daily. Given this development, it would be reasonable to infer that the fear of Oil theft would be the main factor affecting the nation’s economy and security; nevertheless, this assumption is invalidated by the loopholes within the oil producing sector highlighting the dismissal of the President’s allegations by IPOB members, claiming an underlying scheme involving high profile individuals and governing bodies in the saga of the ‘’Mysterious case of the stolen oil reserves’’. The attention has shifted away from the root of the unrest connected to the nation’s riches due to the agitations from concerned citizens. Although militancy has significantly impacted the South South and South Eastern parts of the country, it is within the best interest for the nation at large if the focus is placed on the right questions which may include: Who are the major high level players involved in the oil theft cartel? However, the separatists ideology, which is ingrained in the mind of some minorities and the demand for “resource control” by local activists, has stirred significant tension overtime, It is undeniable that the insecurity in the southern region has an impact on the Niger Delta which is the most noteworthy oil supply source. From the militancy threat to unbalanced records and crooked officials, there has been a virtual progression from where the indication

CURATED OSINT, Nigeria, Reports, SECURITY THREATS

IPOB AND THE SOLUDO SOLUTION

In the aftermath of the Anambra Gubernatorial election in December 2021, I wrote an article titled “Anambra Gubernatorial election: A Post Mortem“. In my piece, I x-rayed the factors responsible for a remarkably low voter turnout at the polls. Two of which were – threats by the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and pro-Biafran sentiment. The body of my article examined the duo and the conclusion; an appeal to the Federal Government to collaborate with Governor-elect Professor, Charles Soludo and incorporate negotiations and dialogue in its approach to addressing the secessionist agitations. Interestingly, upon assuming the duties of Governor, Prof. Soludo took the bull by the horn and initiated a Truth, Peace, and Justice commission as a restorative justice approach to the violent agitations. The terms of reference for the committee reads: “The purpose of the Committee on Truth, Justice, and Peace is to seek a restorative justice approach for truth-telling or real facts, for the healing of the victims of the violence. Accounting for responsibility and accountability of the actors, conditional mercy for the repentant perpetrators, restitution for certain losses and rehabilitation of the perpetrators, for the overall aim of restoration of peace and justice as well as the promotion of development in the State, and the region/Nigeria. Terms of Reference for the Committee are to identify the remote and immediate causes of the agitations, restiveness, violence, and armed struggle in the Southeast since 1999. Document victims/circumstances of death, brutality, and incarceration, identify stakeholders and groups who have played critical roles in the agitations and conflicts, their roles, capabilities and demands. Address any other issue(s) that may be germane to unravelling the extent of the crisis and charting the roadmap for the future and make recommendations for sustainable peace and security in Anambra state/Southeast”. As civilians and Government Security Forces, comprised of paramilitary and military outfits in the South-East are witnessing an avalanche of attacks from Unidentified Armed Groups (UAG) popularly referred to as ‘Unknown Gunmen’ and the Eastern Security Network, the militia arm of IPOB, the composition of this committee is timely, as initiatives that would bring insecurity and potential instability to a halt must be supported. Channels for reconciliation and dialogue are an opportunity for people to state their grievances, which can be recognized and addressed. With Governor Charles Soludo leading such a promising charge, the Federal Government must offer him their covert and overt support, he must also push for inclusiveness from the Southeast Governors to make this a thorough regional dialogue. It is high time governments at the State and Federal levels look at this conflict to solve it from the root. From the standpoint of statecraft and stability, actions and inactions of the Federal Government have contributed to IPOB’s insurgency. From the onset, the Federal Government was mistaken to interpret IPOB’s Biafra agitation as a security issue, when it was in the realm of the political. As opposed to political dialogue and solutions, Federal Government responded with an overkill- military response. This military response was conducted without tact and worsened feelings of grievances against the Nigerian state. A report released by Amnesty International details how in 2016 the Nigerian Army extra-judicially executed at least 150 pro-Biafran protesters. The report titled: “Bullets Were Raining Everywhere”: Deadly Repression of Pro-Biafra Activists, relied on the analysis of videos, photographs and eyewitness testimonies to reveal the Nigerian Army firing live ammunition to disperse protesters most of them being members of IPOB, this was a gross human rights violation dastardlier than the one that triggered Boko Haram’s violent streak. This gross human rights violation is a remote cause of the armed chapter of IPOB’s agitation, it contributed to feelings of discontent against the Nigerian state and sympathy for IPOB amongst indigenes of the South-East. IPOB is not blameless in this debacle because suppression by the Nigerian Army is not a justification to go haywire and set the country ablaze. If anything, they have shown they’re agents of destruction and they deserved their proscription as a terrorist group. The group has participated in senseless killings of security personnel, persons who “flout” their sit-at-home orders, Igbos who do not accept their reign of terror, Fulani pastoralists/herders, and related ethnic cleansing in the South-East through its ESN militia. These killings are deliberate and not accidental. IPOB understands targeted assassinations of Northerners might prompt retaliation in the North; they are betting on their killings precipitating a chain reaction of terrible events that would lead to the realisation of Biafra. IPOB-ESN is an internal threat that exposes the ethnoreligious/political disunity in the country and the FG’s lack of monopoly on violence. The federal government and its institutions mismanaged the crisis at its inception and failed to nip in the bud the rebellion, now they must de-escalate in conjunction with the State government. Failure to counter it holistically would drag the country down a path of a protracted insurgency like Boko Haram. And this would not bode well for a country on the brink and for a region whose lifeblood is commerce. Two factors at the core of IPOB’s reign of terror are: – Sit at home order– As a ploy to protest the incarceration of its leader- Nnamdi Kanu. IPOB enforces an involuntary sit at home order for people of the SE. Every Monday members of the IPOB’s Eastern Security Network (ESN) move around the streets to ensure compliance. Markets, schools, banks, motor parks, worship centres and disturbingly even police stations closed. This remarkable compliance is troubling. It indicates that citizens comply because they are aware that security agencies cannot save them from the wrath of IPOB which affects the economy of the region adversely. This trend needs to be reversed. – The Unknown Gunmen Phenomenon: The term “unknown gunmen” firstly arose from social media mediocre of the security term “Unidentified Gunman” or “Unidentified Armed Group,” with a combination of media bias. The Unidentified or Unknown actor tag is when an actor’s identity or connection is uncertain. However, a majority of these so-called unidentified

CURATED OSINT

Sit-at-home: Security agencies patrol Umuahia, as IPOB talks tough

Sit-at-home: Security agencies patrol Umuahia, as IPOB talks tough

AHEAD of today’s sit-at-home order by the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, and other pro-Biafra groups, security operatives have, in the past one week, been engaged in Operation Show-of-Force with a combined force of Military, Naval and Police personnel patrolling the major streets of Umuahia and environs.

Continue reading Sit-at-home: Security agencies patrol Umuahia, as IPOB talks tough at Vanguard News.

CURATED OSINT

Biafra: IPOB raises alarm over alleged arrest, missing members in Enugu

The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) on Wednesday alleged that several of their members were arrested in Enugu State, with their whereabouts unknown. IPOB spokesman, Emma Powerful, in a statement, said the unspecified number of their members were arrested around Nike Area of Enugu State, en-route Nsukka. He further alleged that the members have been […]

Biafra: IPOB raises alarm over alleged arrest, missing members in Enugu

CURATED OSINT

We Will Treat Anyone Associated With IPOB As A Terrorist – Abia CP

 The Abia State Police Command has warned the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) against any activity capable of truncating the peace and safety of the residents. The Commissioner of Police in the state, Ene Okon, gave the warning in an interview on Channels Television. He said that anyone or group of persons associated with … Continue reading We Will Treat Anyone Associated With IPOB As A Terrorist – Abia CP

Scroll to Top